|
Home >
Products >
BRIDGE >
EDRMS Integration
|
Text Size:
T
T
Print
|
|
|
 |
|
In implementing its Document Management and Web Content Management strategy, organisations will be faced with two fundamentally different approaches:
Netcat strongly believes that the latter approach will deliver you the optimum result.
Criteria
|
DM/WCM from a single vendor
|
Advantages of Netcat – DM integration
|
Approach
|
The DM and WCM are supplied by one company. Products fall into 3 categories:
- the heritage of a single product - these systems are generally powerful, but complex and unintuitive.
- where WCM is an add-on to an existing DM product (occasionally vice versa). The WCM capability is invariably “light” or basic and unsuitable for enterprise-scale websites or intranets.
- those that are the result of mergers between DM and WCM companies. Integration is generally poor.
|
Netcat specialises in web content management and is user, rather than document-centric. Our philosophy and business model is to be the best WCM and integrate with the best DM companies – TRIM, Hummingbird, Worksite, Objective etc. None of these matches Netcat’s web content management usability, scalability or breadth of functionality at an affordable price.
We recommend you purchase the DM system that best suits your needs together with Netcat WCM. i.e. the best DM working in concert with the best WCM.
|
Built-in integration
|
The notion of a single product is often illusory as the products:
It is worth asking a vendor to “define” integration as in most cases integration between DM and WCM is far from complete. In fact, in most cases integration consists of simple import and export between the formerly separate systems.
|
To Netcat, integration means:
-
Info created in Netcat WCM can be placed in the DM system
-
Material in the DM system can be taken out of it for use in multi-media applications
-
An intuitive interface where an easy to use explorer-style view of info in the DM, WCM and file systems is available to non-technical users
-
Security is managed by the DM system and adopted by the WCM
-
A single log-on across network, DM and WCM systems
-
A single taxonomy with the DM metadata set extended for the web
-
Delivery of a federated search across the DM, WCM & File systems
|
Usability
|
In most combined products the DM product is the dominant technology. As a consequence
-
combined DM/WCM products are document-centric.
-
there is an emphasis on DM and RM technical functionality
-
there is an implicit presumption that the user is technically competent or “RM-savvy”.
-
integration means trying to “web-enable” formerly non-web systems.
-
The learning curve is steep.
|
Netcat’s heritage is the Web. With Netcat WCM:
-
the product is user-centric
-
there is deep functionality, but with an emphasis on ease of use by non-technical people.
-
There is a fast learning curve as most users will already know MS-Office. Our mantra is: “if you can use Word, you can use Netcat”.
-
Netcat effectively becomes the easy-to-use “front-end” into the DM repository.
|
Pricing
|
With larger DM products the costs of DM + WCM is expensive.
With DM products with “light” or basic WCM, vendors will often discount the WCM component.
|
Compared against either DM-type, the “Total cost of ownership” of Netcat over a three year period is relatively low. The software will quickly pay for itself in productivity terms alone.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
 |
 |